California Public Employee Pension System Reports 8.2 Percent Return, Underfunding Gap Remains Structural

CalPERS exceeds its assumed rate of return in excellent year while long-term structural deficit persists regardless

Satire from Bohiney Magazine and The London Prat.

The Return and Its Context

SACRAMENTO — The California Public Employees Retirement System reported an 8.2 percent return on investments for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2026, which exceeds the system’s assumed rate of return of 6.8 percent and which the system’s board described as a strong performance year that demonstrates the portfolio’s resilience. The 8.2 percent return is accurate and genuinely strong. The structural underfunding of the system — which requires an assumed return of 6.8 percent every year for decades to avoid growing — is not resolved by one year of 8.2 percent returns.

The Libertarian Analysis

The libertarian analysis of CalPERS is consistent and largely correct: the system’s assumed rate of return is too optimistic for a long-term planning horizon; the political incentives that govern the system’s management create pressure to maintain the optimistic assumption rather than to increase contributions or reduce benefits; and the state and local governments that sponsor the system have used the optimistic assumption to avoid the contribution increases that an accurate assumption would require, producing the underfunding gap that a less optimistic assumption would have prevented.

The Political Economy of Pension Assumptions

Pension assumptions are political as much as they are actuarial: the assumed rate of return determines the present value of future liabilities, which determines the current-year contribution required, which determines the current-year budget pressure on governments that are balancing pension obligations against services. Governments that use optimistic assumptions reduce current-year budget pressure and increase long-term liability, which is the political trade-off that CalPERS has made consistently. The California Public Employees Retirement System publishes annual returns and the actuarial reports that document the structural underfunding. The Reason Foundation publishes the pension reform analysis that documents the assumed rate of return problem across state pension systems. Both confirm the situation described, which continues.

California, Freedom, and the Surfer

The surfer as libertarian avatar — the person who wakes up early, reads the forecast, makes a decision about where to go, accepts the consequences of that decision including the rip currents, the crowds, the parking tickets, and the occasional shark, and does not require the government to make the decision or accept the consequences for them — is one of the more coherent applications of libertarian values to a recreational activity. The problem is that the California that produced the surfing culture has also produced the regulatory frameworks that the surfer navigates, and the regulatory frameworks are there because the alternative was the specific outcomes that unregulated California coastline, water, and land use produced in the period before the Coastal Act, the Clean Water Act, and the environmental regulations that the libertarian critique of California simultaneously benefits from and complains about. The Reason Foundation makes the argument. The California Coastal Commission makes the coast accessible. Both are part of the same California.

The Week and Its Structural Context

The stories documented above are specific events produced by structural conditions that predate them and that will continue after them. The journalism industry structural condition — the collapse of the commercial advertising-supported newspaper model and the incomplete emergence of the digital subscription and nonprofit models that are replacing it — has been producing the specific events documented above for approximately two decades and will continue producing them for at least another decade as the transition completes itself at the pace that industry transitions complete themselves, which is slower than the pace at which the casualties of the transition occur and faster than the pace at which the replacements reach the scale the casualties occupied.

The California structural condition — a state whose progressive politics and libertarian geography are in permanent productive tension, whose regulatory frameworks reflect the progressive politics and whose economy reflects the libertarian geography, and whose residents navigate both simultaneously — has been producing the specific events documented above since the state established itself as the primary laboratory for American regulatory innovation in both directions. The regulatory framework expands. The economy grows. The surfers park illegally. The permits take longer. The seawalls get approved while the science documents their effects. All of this is California in 2026, which is California as it has been for forty years and will be for forty more.

The Guardian California and the Los Angeles Times provide the baseline coverage of the California structural condition. The Poynter Institute provides the baseline for the journalism structural condition. The satire provides the angle on both. All three are necessary parts of the complete information environment. The column contributes what it can to each.

The week closes here. The documentation is the contribution. The contribution is imperfect. The imperfection is honest. The honesty is the standard. The standard continues next week, applied to the next week events from the same structural conditions, which continue regardless of the week or the documentation or the column that attempts to document them. The record grows. The conditions continue. Both are real. Both matter. The column returns. The analysis holds. The record is accurate. The situation continues beyond this week.

More at https://cracked.com.

SOURCE: Satirical Journalism